ShareThis Page

Prisuta: Bylsma finds right combos

| Wednesday, June 10, 2009

If he was going down, Dan Bylsma was going down swinging.

He'd planned for this, remember. He contemplated long and hard about how he'd handle someday becoming a head coach in the NHL long before he got the call ahead of schedule.

So, the prospect of facing elimination against the mighty Detroit Red Wings on the heels of a 5-0 shellacking wasn't about to unnerve the Penguins' first-year coach.

The poise, preparation and sense of purpose trickled down to Bylsma's players in a remarkable 2-1 victory in Game 6 on Tuesday night at Mellon Arena.

Game 7 is scheduled for Friday night in Detroit.

"The best thing you can tell them is it's about going out and winning the game," said Bylsma, who played in a Game 7 with Anaheim in 2003. "It's not about trying not to lose."

Bylsma, thus, was about a lot more than sending Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin out onto the ice, one after the other or together if necessary, and letting his stars decide the Penguins' fate.

Bylsma's orchestration of Game 6 began before Game 6 did, with the announcement that Petr Sykora would return to active duty following a month in mothballs in place of Miroslav Satan.

Sykora started out on the fourth line but wound up playing with Crosby and with his old linemates, Malkin and Ruslan Fedotenko.

Sykora also played on the second power-play unit with Chris Kunitz and Jordan Staal.

Max Talbot played some with Fedotenko and Malkin as usual, and also with Fedotenko and Kunitz, and with Pascal Dupuis and Craig Adams.

And with the Penguins' clinging to a one-goal lead and just over a minute left, Staal and Adams joined Crosby, a threesome that eventually gave way to Talbot, Adams and Matt Cooke, before Crosby and Staal returned to play the final 13.2 seconds with Talbot.

Bylsma maintained he didn't push any more buttons than he normally does. And the game still came down to a breathtaking save by Marc-Andre Fleury on a Dan Cleary breakaway, and a couple of stops by defenseman Rob Scuderi in the crease on whacks by Johan Franzen.

But the breaks, bounces, non-calls and game-saving plays didn't make Bylsma's proactive stance, leadership and bench management any less critical.

"Some of it's a gut feel," Bylsma said. "Some of it's giving a guy an opportunity."

His running of a game is not unlike the method often relied upon by his predecessor, Michel Therrien, in that regard.

The wheels are always spinning behind Bylsma's glasses, and the seemingly haphazard moves are all a part of a master plan.

"The common theme is 'worry about the task at hand, and that's your shift,' " Penguins assistant coach Tom Fitzgerald said. "Then, you worry about your next shift and your next shift.

"Whether he taps you on the shoulder and you're playing center, left wing or right wing, and you're playing with two different people, just go do your job and play the way we're capable of playing."

That's an approach that has delivered the Penguins from oblivion to the brink of immortality.

"I don't have a ton of experience," Bylsma said, looking ahead to Game 7. "I can tell you that we're going to approach it like we just gave ourselves an opportunity that we didn't have before (Tuesday night).

"That's one game for the Stanley Cup."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.