Backup goalie hurt in Pens' loss
TORONTO -- John Curry just might open the regular season as goalie Marc-Andre Fleury's backup after all.
Ticketed for the American Hockey League after the offseason signing of veteran goalie Brent Johnson, Curry replaced Johnson for the third period Tuesday in the Penguins' 3-2 exhibition shootout loss to the Toronto Maple Leafs at Air Canada Center.
Maple Leafs center Nazem Kadri pulled Toronto even, 2-2, at 18:52 of the third period. Toronto won the shootout, 2-0.
Johnson stopped 14 of 15 shots, but he tweaked a knee midway through the second period on a collision with Toronto center Tyler Bozak. It occurred after Johnson stopped Bozak's shot, the rebound of which was stuffed into an open net by Maple Leafs winger Viktor Stahlberg.
Johnson finished the period but did not join teammates on the bench in the third.
"We will see (about Johnson's status)," Penguins coach Dan Bylsma said. "It was more precautionary than anything."
Johnson is coming off hip surgery, which cut short his 2008-09 season after just 21 games for the Washington Capitals.
The Penguins opened a two-goal lead in the opening period on tallies by wingers Ryan Bayda and Chris Conner -- each trying to win a spot as an extra forward on the regular-season roster.
Star centers Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin were among the prominent players to sit out. Center Jordan Staal was in the lineup and fought Maples Leafs defenseman Mike Komisarek late in the second period.
The Penguins are 1-2-1 in the exhibition season and will play at Columbus on Thursday.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.