ShareThis Page

Bylsma makes changes to power play

| Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2009

Sergei Gonchar spent most of his Monday morning sandwiched high in the offensive zone by Penguins centers Evgeni Malkin and Sidney Crosby, shooting pucks from the middle point toward wingers Bill Guerin and Matt Cooke, who were positioned near the goal crease.

"We'll see how we do in the game," said Gonchar, a defenseman who runs the Penguins' much maligned power play. "It doesn't matter how good you look in the morning; it only matters how you look at night."

The Penguins (22-10-1, 45 points) look like a team that can win without a productive power play, but Gonchar knows that their second-to-last 13.6 percentage won't cut it for many more nights.

"Imagine if we could score on the power play how much better we could be," he said.

Scoring more goals - starting tonight against the Philadelphia Flyers at home - is the idea behind power-play alterations put into place by head coach Dan Bylsma during practice at Mellon Arena.

Malkin was moved from the right side to the left point, leaving Gonchar the only actual defenseman on the top advantage unit. Cooke was inserted into the mix to replace Malkin, who previously was positioned below Crosby on the right half-wall.

Points without power
A look at the noteworthy power-play goal droughts by the last three NHL scoring champions over the past three seasons:

"Hopefully (opponents will) have to spread out a bit more," said Crosby, who has scored a power-play goal in only two of his past 22 games. "We're both in pretty good shooting and playmaking positions... and (we've) got Gonchar right between us.

"One of the three of us will be open."

Provided the open player can put the puck near the cage Bylsma is counting upon Cooke to bring a bunch of nastiness near the goalie.

With six goals, Cooke is on pace for 15, which would equal his career-best mark from seven seasons ago with Vancouver. He has scored 11 goals in 56 games played under Bylsma, a personal-best .20 per-game pace.

"He has shown to me so far that he has the ability to stand up there and tip pucks in," Bylsma said. "He goes to hard areas and you know he's out on the ice. He attracts attention that way."

The possible fly in this ointment for a power play that has failed to produce a goal in 19 of 33 games is Malkin, who is less than two years removed from complaining about the defensive responsibilities that come with working the left point.

He caused a controversy during the 2008 Stanley Cup Final after telling the Tribune-Review that he did not want to play the left point on the power play - a position he was assigned after the late-season return from injury by Crosby.

Apparently time has changed Malkin, whose power-play goal Saturday against Florida snapped a 10-contest drought.

"I feel comfortable with the puck," he said of the left point.

Bylsma left nothing to chance regarding the move of Malkin on the power play.

"We've talked to Geno about that before," he said. "We knew that going into the situation.

"Right now Geno... wants to be there. He likes what it offers him - the seam aspect that it provides; the opportunity to pass to Sid for a shot; and at the same time Gonchar is there."

Gonchar warned against expecting power-play positioning changes to make a difference unless the Penguins start working harder to make use of the man-advantage.

"Sometimes you just need a chance; maybe this is one of those situations," he said. "At the same time it doesn't matter how much talent you have. You have to still work hard to retrieve those pucks and get it back after you take a shot."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.