Penguins' Letang tries to put bite behind him
Penguins defenseman Kris Letang admitted it isn't something easily forgotten. But he's trying to make the alleged biting incident in an October game in Philadelphia a distant memory.
With the Flyers back in town, Letang was reminded that Scott Hartnell allegedly bit his finger Oct. 8.
"I'm going to try to keep my gloves on this time," Letang said.
Letang is still irritated by what took place, but said all the right things following the team's pre-game skate Tuesday.
"I'm trying not to focus on it," Letang said. "You have to forget about it. You can't get into scrums against them after whistles. It's the same as always."
The Penguins admitted before the game that battles with the Flyers always have their attention, sometimes even days in advance. These games remind coach Dan Bylsma of contests between Anaheim and Los Angeles when he played for both franchises. This rivalry, he admitted, is even bigger.
"These kinds of games have a different feel," he said.
» The Penguins awarded the 2009 Bob Johnson Memorial Scholarship to Latrobe Area senior Ryan LaDuke. In three years at Latrobe, LaDuke has produced 55 goals and 100 points. The award represents excellence on the ice, in the community and in the class room. It has been awarded every year since 1992.
» Left wing Max Talbot was the odd man out of the Penguins' rotation against the Flyers. The team wanted Eric Godard in the lineup against Philadelphia. Talbot has one goal since returning to the lineup four weeks ago.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.