Pens coach Bylsma presents some new lines
Former Penguins coach Michel Therrien was frequently criticized for his insistence on constantly making line changes. Dan Bylsma doesn't make line changes as often, but he isn't afraid to shuffle his forwards.
The Penguins showcased some new lines against Ottawa, and the coach's reasons for the decision are varied.
"It's more than a gut (feeling)," Bylsma said. "There may be players who need to get more playing time."
Bylsma's decision to tinker with lines before the game is a bit of a change from his occasional altering during action. Evgeni Malkin played between Bill Guerin and Chris Kunitz much of the night, while Crosby centered Ruslan Fedotenko and Pascal Dupuis, who often flank Malkin.
» Legendary Russian goalie Vladislav Tretiak, who was famously pulled after the first period in the "Miracle on Ice" in the 1980 Olympics, made a rare appearance at Mellon Arena on Wednesday. He is the general manager of the Russian Olympic team and was in town to speak with Malkin and Sergei Gonchar about the upcoming tournament.
» The Ottawa Senators peppered Penguins goalie Marc-Andre Fleury with 24 shots in the first period, which is one shy of the all-time mark against the Penguins at home. Vancouver registered 25 shots on net in one period at Mellon Arena in 1989.
» Malkin's first-period power play goal was his first with the man advantage in 15 games.
» Mark Eaton was again held out of the Penguins lineup with a knee injury. It is believed he will miss around a week of action.
» Eric Godard was the Penguins' only healthy scratch.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.