Winger Kunitz eyes return to Pens' lineup
Penguins left wing Chris Kunitz doesn't want to rush his return from something as delicate as abdominal surgery, but he indicated there is a legitimate chance he could play Saturday in Montreal.
Kunitz practiced again with the team Wednesday at Mellon Arena and said his return should be near. But he doesn't feel 100 percent yet.
"I still feel things out there," said Kunitz, referring to the abdominal injury. "I don't know if that's from the injury or just part of the healing process."
The Penguins are off today, but Kunitz plans to skate. Then, he will likely practice with the team Friday. If he gets through that practice and feels well, he might play against the Canadiens.
"Friday will be the test," he said.
» Left wing Max Talbot left Penguins practice after about 15 minutes. He has been bothered by a sore groin and isn't likely to play this weekend in Montreal and Washington. Penguins coach Dan Bylsma wasn't sure of Talbot's status but said his inability to make it through practice was discouraging.
» Defenseman Jay McKee, a scratch Monday against Buffalo, also left practice early and is believed to be banged up.
» The Penguins welcomed local children from the Make-a-Wish program to yesterday's practice. After practice, the children and their families had lunch at the Igloo club and were visited by all of the Penguins players and coaches.
» Center Evgeni Malkin said he will likely wear No. 11 in the upcoming Olympics in Vancouver. His Russian teammate, Ilya Kovalchuk, historically wears No. 71 in international play.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.