ShareThis Page

Pens' Adams baffled by ejection from game

Kevin Gorman
| Saturday, March 13, 2010

NEWARK, N.J. — Penguins forward Craig Adams heard multiple explanations for the charging call that led to a game misconduct and his ejection Friday night. He wasn't happy with any of them.

"The first linesman told me it was icing, which it wasn't," Adams said. "The second linesman told me it was a high-sticking call, which if you watch the replay, I'm about 10 or 15 feet past the linesman before he makes the signal that it's a high stick, so I have no way of knowing it's a high stick.

"As far as I was concerned, it was just a regular forecheck. Somebody told me I jumped and left my feet, which you clearly see that I didn't. So I'm baffled. People can decide for themselves."

Penguins coach Dan Bylsma said he was "a little bit" surprised, too.

"I didn't expect a major," Bylsma said.

» With Evgeni Malkin a minus-10 over the past 18 games and a minus-5 for the season — which ranks 629th in the NHL — Bylsma was asked if Malkin's two-way play has been addressed.

"Sometimes, the statistics can be deceiving as to how a player is playing," Bylsma said. "I think since the break, he's come out with a rejuvenated effort in terms of playing on both sides of the puck and playing away from the puck. He's outstanding with the puck — he's dynamic with the puck — but sometimes he wants to go get it and have it at all times and keep it at all times."

Bylsma credited Malkin with improving his play on defense, playing away from the puck and his management of it in the offensive zone. Bylsma said Malkin's past six games — in which he is minus-4 — "have been probably his best away from the puck and managing the puck all year long."

» The Penguins took the opening faceoff with a line centered by Jordan Staal, who was flanked by left wing Matt Cooke and right wing Bill Guerin. The second line saw Malkin with Alexei Ponikarovsky and Ruslan Fedotenko, and the third with Sidney Crosby, Chris Kunitz and Pascal Dupuis. But Bylsma switched the lines up with regularity, as Dupuis also skated on the fourth line with Max Talbot and Mike Rupp.

» Tyler Kennedy was a healthy scratch for the second consecutive game and appears to be the odd-man out at the moment with the Penguins' abundance of forwards. Kennedy hasn't scored a goal in 16 games and has only four since scoring five in the first nine games of the season.

"It's not an easy decision, to say this guy should not be in the lineup tonight," Bylsma said. "He will get back in there. He's a very good player, a player who's done a lot of good things and adds a lot to our lineup. It's not a situation where he's not going to get back in there anytime soon."

The Penguins' other scratches were right wing Eric Godard and defenseman Jay McKee.

» New Jersey defenseman Martin Skoula, who played 33 games for the Penguins this season, told the Newark Star-Ledger he was anxious to face his former team "to show them that they made a mistake trading me." Skoula was part of the March 2 deal that brought Ponikarovsky to the Penguins. The next day, Toronto traded Skoula to the Devils for a fifth-round draft pick. Skoula was involved in a couple of skirmishes, first drawing a first-period penalty for holding Guerin and later was on the receiving end of a shot that culminated in Craig Adams getting a five-minute major for charging and an accompanying game misconduct.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.