Rossi: Accept it: danger is part of deal in NHL
On the second day of high school football practice during my sophomore year, a senior linebacker busted through a gap on a dummy-team offensive line and crushed a fairly clueless fullback with force.
I was that fullback.
A few plays later I alerted a coach to the blurred vision and was removed from practice. After a night in the hospital for observation I was diagnosed with post-concussion syndrome, and I didn't play for another 10 weeks.
Four months after football season ended a blade-hockey defenseman was lightly bumped while retrieving the ball in the defensive zone. Teammates said the following few shifts showed that defenseman skating with a slower stride, his reaction to plays a few seconds off.
I was that defenseman.
A day later, a doctor warned me against playing contact sports for at least six months because of my second diagnosed concussion in less than a year.
Almost 16 years and an auto accident-induced concussion later I am still unable to sleep well through a majority of nights and I experience occasional startled reactions to the simplest of movements. I cannot say for certain those conditions are because of my concussions, but I don't remember them from before my head was repeatedly hit.
So, I suspect readers may be surprised that I have no problem with the controversial hit by Penguins winger Matt Cooke on Boston center Marc Savard last Sunday at Mellon Arena - even though Savard was left with a Grade 2 concussion.
Cooke's hit was legal by current NHL rules, a league with a thematic rule of accepted violence. These literal and thematic rules are understood when players sign an NHL contract, as is the cold reality that every player's next shift could be his last.
I do more than feel for Savard. I fear for him because I suspect his life has been forever changed by this serious concussion. I also am thrilled that league general managers have taken a big step toward eliminating blind-side hits by drafting a proposed rule change for next season.
Those hits should be prevented as much as possible, but they cannot be taken out of this game as long as it is played in a confined space at a fast pace by elite athletes trained to be aggressive.
If players aren't comfortable with the possibility of serious head injuries, if they don't like it that violence has been and will be a part of the NHL, they should consider switching professions.
Danger is part of the deal.
FOUR IN PLAY
The four players (not stationed in Pittsburgh or Washington) that the NHL should push for the talk-show circuit:
1 - ZACH PARISE
He plays in Newark, but his game-personality combo belongs on Broadway.
2 - STEVEN STAMKOS
Probably on his way to the least talked-about 50-goal season in recent memory.
3 - ANZE KOPITAR/DREW DOUGHTY (tie)
They're the dynamic duo that has LA-LA Land looking at pucks again.
4 - JONATHAN TOEWS
You could count on one hand his bad plays and wrong words.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.