ShareThis Page

Costly plays don't rattle Senators' rookies

| Monday, April 19, 2010

OTTAWA — They were celebrated in Game 1 as the rookies who scored goals in their first playoff games, a pair of unlikely heroes in Ottawa's upset of the defending Stanley Cup champion Penguins at Mellon Arena.

This time, Ottawa forward Peter Regin and defenseman Erik Karlsson were involved in a pair of pivotal plays of a 4-2 loss to the Penguins Sunday in Game 3 of their Eastern Conference quarterfinal series at Scotiabank Place.

Regin had a goal disallowed in the final minute of the first period, and Karlsson was called for a slashing penalty during a power play that led to the Penguins taking a two-goal edge late in the second.

Just don't tell them that it's a matter of experiencing the highs and lows of playoff hockey for the first time in their careers.

Neither player is willing to buy that.

"I don't think you could say that," Regin said. "I think we both played well. I think we had some bad bounces. The stick broke on Erik, and I tried to score a goal. So I don't think you can say that it was a low."

Instead of scoring a goal for a third consecutive game, Regin had a potential game-tying tally disallowed with the Penguins leading, 2-1, and 40.8 seconds remaining in the first period. A video review determined that the puck bounced off his skate and never touched his stick before dribbling between goalie Marc-Andre Fleury's legs.

"I thought it was a goal," Regin said. "But it was still early in the game, and we knew we could have bounced back."

The Senators had their chance when winger Matt Cooke was called for boarding Regin behind the Penguins' net at 17:04 of the second period.

Trailing, 2-1, a power-play goal would have tied the score. Instead, the opportunity ended only 27 seconds later, when the 19-year-old Karlsson drew a slashing penalty for breaking Jordan Staal's stick along the boards.

"It's unfortunate that his stick breaks there - a little unnecessary, too - but it's the way the game is," said Karlsson, who became the first defenseman under the age of 20 to score a postseason goal since Wade Redden in 1997 with a power-play tally in the second period of Game 1. "Every time a stick breaks, it's unfortunate that it's a penalty. Sometimes, it doesn't have to be hard for the stick to break."

That mistake was compounded when Cooke's exit from the penalty box was perfectly timed amid a neutral-zone rush. He picked up the puck as he skated along the blue line and passed it around the boards to Sidney Crosby.

Crosby dragged defenseman Andy Sutton across ice to the left circle before flicking a wrist shot past goalie Brian Elliott for a 3-1 lead with 44.4 seconds left in the period.

"When I came out, I was supposed to come to the bench, but the puck came back to me, and I chased it," Cooke said. "I just tried to get the puck to Sid, and I did, and he did what he does best."

That it came at the expense of Regin and Karlsson made no difference to Ottawa's prized rookies, who weren't rattled by their unfortunate roles in the defeat.

"We just try to play the game like anybody else," Karlsson said. "For some guys, it's their first year, and for other guys it's their 10th year. It doesn't matter."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.