Canadiens are planning to block Penguins
WASHINGTON — Hal Gill blocked so many shots in the first-round series against the Washington Capitals that the Montreal defenseman was asked if he was an emergency backup to goaltender Jaroslav Halak.
"Sometimes, it felt like that," said Gill, who had six of his series-best 31 blocked shots in the 2-1 Game 7 victory Wednesday night. "You try to do whatever you can to get in front of a shot, help him out any way and take the pressure off him. He had a lot of pressure on him."
After stopping the team that led the NHL in both games won and goals scored, the Canadiens next face the pressure of trying to dethrone the defending Stanley Cup champions when they play the Penguins in Game 1 of their Eastern Conference semifinal at 7 p.m. Friday night at Mellon Arena.
"Anytime you're in the playoffs, you want to compete against the best," said Montreal center Dominic Moore, a former Penguin who scored the Game 7 winner against Washington. "They're obviously proven what they are, proven that they're the best. For us, it's a fun challenge."
No one in Montreal knows the Penguins, especially captain Sidney Crosby, as well as Gill. He formed a shutdown defensive pairing with Rob Scuderi for the Cup champions last year and practiced against Crosby on a daily basis before leaving for Montreal through free agency last summer.
"That doesn't mean it's any easier," Gill said. "He's got a lot of tricks up his sleeve."
Montreal has some of its own.
The Canadiens employed a defensive tactic against the Capitals that was similar in strategy to what the Ottawa Senators did to the Penguins in the first round: They protected their goalie by clogging shooting lanes and blocking shots — including 41 in the 2-1 victory in Game 7 — in an effort that caused the league's best power play to go 1-for-33 for the series.
"You need to have that to be successful," Montreal coach Jacques Martin said. "It shows a commitment on the part of the players. They know at this time of the year, you've got to do everything in your power to win games. It means sometimes taking hits to make plays. It means blocking shots. It means to be fully committed."
Gill hinted that playing the Penguins could require a different game plan, considering the presence of playoffs scoring leader Crosby (14 points) and fellow centers Evgeni Malkin and Jordan Staal up the middle.
"They have different personnel," Gill said. "It's going to take a team effort. You've got to shut down Sid. He's been pretty awesome, so that's no easy task. That's going to take five, six guys at once.
"It's going to take everyone."
THE ODDS ARE
The three Eastern Conference division winners are out of the Stanley Cup playoffs, leaving the defending champion Penguins holding home-ice advantage until the Stanley Cup Final. A look at the current postseason odds:
5:2 — ODDS ON PENS TO DEFEND THE CUP (they were 6:1 going into the first round)
5:1 — ODDS OF PENS-WINGS III IN THE FINAL (they were 20:1 going into the first round)
9:4 — ODD THAT ROSSI'S PENS-OVER-HABS IN 5 PICK IS CORRECT
odds to win conn smythe trophy as playoff mvp:
1. Sidney Crosby (PIT) — 11:4
2. Evgeni Malkin (PIT) — 5:1
3. Marc-Andre Fleury (PIT) — 5:1
4. Daniel Sedin (VAN) — 6:1
5. Patrick Kane (CHI) — 6:1
6. Jonathan Toews (CHI) — 6:1
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.