Cooke-Asham could fit nicely on same line
Three observations about Saturday's practice from beat reporter Rob Rossi:
General manager Ray Shero's desire is for the Penguins to be "a tough team to play against," so he had to like seeing the potential third-line grouping of feisty wingers Matt Cooke and Arron Asham. No matter the pivot, any line with Cooke and Asham could equally frustrate opponents heavy with skilled forwards, such as Washington, and answer clubs that play with an edge, such as Philadelphia.
Forward Dustin Jeffrey's game is so solid that he rarely sticks out on the ice. However, he also rarely is in the wrong position whether playing at center or on the wing. The Penguins should see how he looks in the middle on a line with forwards Craig Adams and Mike Rupp — role-playing veterans with whom a steady prospect might mesh.
Several players described the ice at Consol Energy Center in unkind terms, and they didn't see a Friday-night concert as a good excuse for the sloppy conditions. Yesterday was a warm Day 1 for hockey at the new arena. Also, the building was packed with thousands of fans. Still, the feeling among many veteran players is that facility's anticipated busy schedule will work against any significant ice improvements that were expected coming from the NHL's oldest building, the Civic Arena.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.