ShareThis Page

Penguins erase recent memory, look to Game 7

| Wednesday, April 27, 2011

The Game 5 meltdown and the missed opportunities in Game 6 don't matter. Neither does Martin St. Louis' previous brilliance, the power play's descent to ineptitude or Chris Conner's botched penalty shot.

That's the beauty of a Game 7.

A series with no rhythm and little predictability will produce a defining moment tonight when the Penguins and Tampa Bay Lightning clash at 8 p.m. at Consol Energy Center.

"It's not just another game, and you're aware of that going in," Penguins defenseman Ben Lovejoy said. "We haven't played our best. But the great thing is that we have one more chance."

If the Penguins win this game, the season will be considered an undeniable success. Producing 106 points and winning a playoff series without Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin would represent magnificent achievements. Plus, a victory would extend the season for suspended left wing Matt Cooke and allot more time for the possibility of a dramatic Crosby return.

Losing another Game 7 on home ice — and blowing a 3-1 series lead for only the second time in franchise history — will leave a black eye on what has been a feel-good season.

"We are all very aware of how big this is," defenseman Matt Niskanen said.

That the Penguins are 2-5 all-time in Game 7s at home has the city nervous, but the team prefers to ignore history and disregard last season's loss to Montreal in the decisive game of the conference semifinals.

"None of us are even thinking about what happens if we lose," said defenseman Paul Martin, whose only career Game 7 ended in disaster when Carolina scored twice in the final minute to eliminate his New Jersey Devils two years ago.

"None of that stuff is in our heads. We just have to go out and do positive things. The outcome will take care of itself."

Players such as David Volek, Tom Fitzgerald and Chico Resch have wrecked Penguins seasons in previous years, becoming immediate villains.

Max Talbot, of course, should represent some optimism. He has scored two goals in a game only four times in 453 career games. One of those was Game 7 in Detroit two years ago, an evening that cemented Talbot's legacy as a big-game player. Reputations are made in Game 7.

Talbot sounds confident about tonight's outcome.

"We have to be composed," he said. "If we play our way, I like our chances."

If it's any consolation, the Penguins are 2-0 in first-round Game 7s at home. Also, the Penguins have been forced to win at least one Game 7 in all three of their Stanley Cup seasons.

These Penguins, though, aren't real concerned about history.

Many players have stated that lessons can be learned from last year's loss to Montreal, but they ultimately choose to focus on tonight.

This is the game in the series that history will remember. The unattractive history of Game 7 losses at home can be largely abolished with a victory.

"We're very capable of winning," Martin said.


"Everybody misses him. Our team misses him. Our coach misses him. Our organization misses him. He's the best player in the world. Everybody needs him."

Kris Letang

Penguins defenseman, on captain Sidney Crosby's absence

"The fans are going to be huge for us. It's a great crowd here. That's a factor. The last change is something the coach appreciates. They have to come into our barn and beat us a third time. We have to stand our ground. We'll be ready."

Matt Niskanen

Penguins defenseman, on playing Game 7 at home

"No. New year. It's something different. We have different guys in this dressing room. We can learn from it. But we're a totally different team. We'll be ready."

Max Talbot

Penguins center, on whether the team will be thinking about last season's loss in Game 7 to Montreal

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.