Penguins captain Crosby ups intensity level
Penguins center Sidney Crosby, still not cleared for contact, participated in a 48-minute practice Friday morning at Southpointe and ramped it up for at least two drills.
On a five-on-five drill that simulates play in one zone, he initially stayed to the perimeter, then became more involved. On an intense, one-on-one drill in which a forward tries to beat a defenseman off the boards, Crosby took some contact but kept going.
He has yet to miss a session in training camp.
» The Penguins reduced their roster to 39 by assigning three forwards — Bryan Lerg, Zach Sill and Keven Veilleux — to their Wilkes-Barre/Scranton AHL affiliate.
» Defenseman Kris Letang missed practice with a migraine, coach Dan Bylsma said. Letang has a history of such headaches. Defenseman Brooks Orpik, recovering from abdominal surgery, stayed off the ice for a maintenance day.
» Tyler Kennedy has been one of the better forwards in camp, but it's unclear whether he will play on the top two lines.
"I don't think he's worried whether he's top-six or not," Bylsma said. "He sure looks like a real effective winger out there, whether he's next to Jordan Staal, Sidney Crosby or Evgeni Malkin. He's playing with a lot of confidence."
» Forward Arron Asham crashed hard into the boards during a drill and was slow to get up but completed the session.
» The Penguins distributed 18,000 free tickets to local youth hockey organizations for today's preseason game against Minnesota. Gates open at 1:30 p.m. for the 3:08 faceoff at Consol Energy Center.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.