Rivers makes $2.6 million arena payment
Rivers Casino today handed over the second of its two annual installments to help pay for the CONSOL Energy Center, a casino spokesman announced.
The money is part of $7.5 million annually the casino pays on the hockey arena's debt. The payments, which are due on April 1 and Oct. 1 of each year, are part of Rivers Casino's gambling license agreement. By the time the 30-year agreement runs out, the casino will have contributed $225 million toward the new home of the Pittsburgh Penguins, which opened last year.
The next payment of $4.9 million is due in April. Since payments began in October, 2009, the casino has paid $17.6 million.
In addition, the casino hosted a poker tournament fundraiser this month that raised more than $22,300 for the Mario Lemieux Foundation, which supports cancer research. Lemieux, co-owner of the Penguins, created the foundation in 1993, the year he was diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease.
"The recreational and entertainment infrastructure in Pittsburgh has rarely been stronger, thanks to great corporate citizens like Rivers Casino," said state Sen. Wayne Fontana, D-Brookline. Fontana is chairman of the city-county Sports & Exhibition Authority, which owns the arena, as well as its soon-to-be-demolished predecessor, the Civic Arena.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.