Penguins sit winger Kennedy against Jets
WINNIPEG, Manitoba — Penguins right winger Tyler Kennedy was held out of the game Monday against the Winnipeg Jets because of concussion-like symptoms, coach Dan Bylsma said, and he was being evaluated to determine more about his status.
Indications were strong that Kennedy also will miss the game Tuesday at Minnesota.
Kennedy appeared in all six games, including the Penguins' loss Saturday to Buffalo, without missing a shift. He first reported his symptoms to the team's athletic trainers late Sunday night after arriving in Winnipeg.
Asked if Kennedy was hurt in the Buffalo game, Bylsma replied, "I'm not entirely sure." He declined further comment on the matter.
General manager Ray Shero said Monday night that Kennedy's tests were being sent back to Pittsburgh to be evaluated by the Penguins' doctors.
In Kennedy's absence, right winger Arron Asham was bumped up to the third line with Mark Letestu and Matt Cooke.
"We've seen Arron produce in the playoffs, so we know he can handle a bigger role," Bylsma said.
Bylsma said forwards Craig Adams and Joe Vitale also could see increased roles.
> > Bylsma, on Sidney Crosby, one of four injured players who did not make the trip: "He was cleared for contact a number of days ago, and he's doing that back in Pittsburgh right now. Hopefully, he can continue on with his progress. There's no timetable now for a return to game action."
> > Evgeni Malkin, another of those four players, will not play Tuesday in Minnesota, Shero said Monday night. The Penguins previously had not ruled that out.
> > With Marc-Andre Fleury starting Monday night, it's expected that Brent Johnson will start in goal Tuesday.
> > Winnipeg wasn't nearly as short-handed as the Penguins, but the Jets had to scratch left winger Evander Kane, their most dangerous forward, because of a lower-body injury.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.