Pens prep to meet former teammate Talbot
The day before Max Talbot signed a five-year, $8.75 million contract with the Philadelphia Flyers, Penguins goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury played golf with his soon-to-be-former teammate in Montreal.
Did he try to talk Talbot into returning to the Penguins, considering they were together for the past six seasons and won the Stanley Cup in 2009?
"I did," said Fleury, a guest along with Penguins defenseman Kris Letang at Talbot's charity tournament. "I tried my best."
Fleury had no chance. The Penguins were offering fewer years (three) than Philadelphia and less money than Talbot had earned last season.
"That's the way hockey goes, I guess," Fleury said.
Maybe Fleury will have better luck with Talbot on Thursday night. The Penguins visit the Flyers at Wells Fargo Center, and Talbot has found a new home in Philadelphia, posting six goals and six assists in 25 games entering Wednesday night's matchup with Buffalo.
Over the years, Fleury faced Talbot regularly in practice, but he said, "It will be different because this one counts."
Said defenseman Brooks Orpik: "It will be more weird for Max than it will be for us. It's just another game for us. I've played against former teammates, but I never had to play against my former team. I'm sure he will be a little bit nervous going into it."
Orpik said Talbot, whose two goals in Game 7 of the 2009 Stanley Cup Final lifted the Penguins to their third title, brings a spark to the game that rubs off on his teammates.
"He's a fun guy who comes to the rink and has a lot of energy," he said. "When he gets to his 500th (career) game, he will be just as excited for that as he was for his first one. It's pretty contagious. Guys like that ... the way they act rubs off on other guys. It picks other guys up."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.