Flyers winger Jaromir Jagr's take
From Jaromir Jagr's media meeting Thursday morning:
On his time in Pittsburgh:
"I played the best hockey I ever played here, no question about it. The fans supported our team even in the tough times. The locker room was good. The fans don't really know everything that happens in the locker room. All they know is what they read in the newspaper and what the media says. Sometimes, I felt it wasn't right. When I was in a bad mood, it was only because I wasn't playing the way I wanted to play.
On his relationship with Mario Lemieux:
"For my side, nothing has changed with Pittsburgh fans. Maybe it's changed with the media because guys write things that aren't even true. It's normal. But to the fans, ownership, the city, nothing has changed. I'll always love it. Because someone boos me doesn't mean I'll say bad things about the city. With Mario, he showed me the big leagues. He was my idol since I was 15 years old. He was the best player to ever play hockey, and he still is. If he's a little upset I didn't come here, it doesn't change my mind about how I feel about him."
On crowd reactions:
"Philly fans boo Sidney Crosby. Did he ever play for them• No. Did he ever do anything bad to them• No. He just plays for Pittsburgh, and he's good. A lot of guys get booed. That's the way it is."
On his decision to sign with the Flyers:
"Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm right. Nobody is going to know. Bottom line, I'm here; you guys are over there. I've got to come to the game. Everybody is going to hate me. And I still have to play. All right, guys. Good luck to everybody. See you next time."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.