Dupuis, Asham hurt in loss to New Jersey
NEWARK, N.J. -- A year defined by injuries saw the Penguins lose two more players in their final game of 2011.
Forward Pascal Dupuis sustained an upper-body injury late in the first period and did not return.
Then, in the second period, right wing Arron Asham injured his foot while blocking a shot. Sensing the injury could be serious, Asham immediately hobbled to the bench and walked directly to the Penguins' locker room.
Neither player returned.
Coach Dan Bylsma said after the game that he was unsure of the nature or severity of the injuries, which essentially relegated the Penguins to nine forwards, as enforcer Steve MacIntyre played only 47 seconds on a shift early in the first period.
The Penguins sent forward Jason Williams to their AHL affiliate in Wilkes-Barre/Scranton a day earlier.
Former Penguins right wing Petr Sykora is back in New Jersey, where he enjoyed most of his NHL success, and is thriving again for the Devils. He has scored 10 goals this season.
Bylsma said he wasn't surprised to see Sykora playing so well, but New Jersey coach Peter DeBoer's expectations were exceeded.
"I'd be lying to you if I didn't say I was surprised," DeBoer said. "My expectation level with him wasn't high coming into camp."
Defenseman Deryk Engelland missed most of the first period after getting hit on the foot with a shot during his first shift. He returned late in the period and played the remainder of the game. Engelland yesterday returned to the lineup for the first time since Dec. 20. He had been suspended three games for a hit to the head against Chicago's Marcus Kruger.
Injured defenseman Paul Martin and injured center Richard Park did not play but could return next week. Martin made the trip to New Jersey, while Park stayed home.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.