Defenseman Martin on way back with Penguins
The Penguins' decision to send defenseman Simon Despres back to Wilkes-Barre/Scranton was a pretty good indication that injured defenseman Paul Martin would be ready to play Friday against the Rangers.
Martin's ability to make it through Monday's 70-minute practice makes it even more likely that he will play when the Penguins return from a five-day layoff.
"It felt good today," Martin said. "We have some days ahead of us to get work done. Our goal is definitely for (playing) Friday."
Martin has not played since sustaining an undisclosed injury Dec. 16 in Ottawa. He skated with regular defense partner Zbynek Michalek during practice.
> > Penguins coach Dan Bylsma didn't give a report on injured forwards Pascal Dupuis and Arron Asham. Neither player skated during Monday's practice, two days after going down in New Jersey.
Bylsma confirmed that Asham was injured when a shot hit his knee. Dupuis is dealing with an upper-body injury. Bylsma said both players are day-to-day. Defenseman Deryk Engelland was also injured after blocking a shot in that game, but he returned to the lineup late in the first period and practiced Tuesday.
> > The Penguins worked on situational hockey during a lengthy practice, including four-on-four play and six-on-five, late-game situations.
> > No updates were given on the conditions of center Sidney Crosby or defenseman Kris Letang, both of whom are dealing with concussion symptoms.
> > The Penguins will host children and their families from the Make-A-Wish Foundation, the Children's Institute of Pittsburgh and The Children's Home today for practice and a luncheon.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.