Neal takes all-star snub in stride
SUNRISE, Fla. -- Penguins right wing James Neal said he intends to use his All-Star Game snub as motivation for the second half of the season.
When asked if the slight could ignite a hot streak, Neal nodded.
"Of course," he said. "Any time you don't get picked for something like that, it's disappointing when you're up there (for consideration)."
Many of his teammates said they were surprised Neal was omitted from the game in Ottawa on Jan. 29. Center Evgeni Malkin is the team's lone representative.
Coach Dan Bylsma said he thought Neal's first half would warrant an selection. The 24-year-old forward is leading the team with 21 goals, which ranks sixth in the NHL. His 10 power-play goals are tops in the league.
"I was surprised not to see him on there," Bylsma said. "His goal total, and what he's done in the first half, I was hoping to see him on that list."
Bylsma has noted on numerous occasions that Neal is not exclusively a goal scorer but rather a solid all-around player. Even when Neal struggled last season, scoring just two goals in 27 games for the Penguins after a trade, Bylsma praised his skating, ability to produce consistent scoring opportunities and defensive work.
Neal took the news that he wasn't selected in stride.
"We've got bigger things to worry about here," he said. "We just want to get back on track and start playing good hockey again."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.