Penguins veteran Adams denies there was captaincy meeting
Right winger Craig Adams, one of the Penguins' veterans, denied a Tribune-Review report Friday that players recently discussed a temporary captaincy with Sidney Crosby out of the lineup.
"Ask every person in this room right now, point-blank, and they'll deny it," Adams said Tuesday in the team's locker room at Consol Energy Center. "Knowing the people in this room, I don't think that could happen here. And for it to be a topic of conversation, for some of our fans to think it did happen, that's pretty sad."
General manager Ray Shero also denied that there was a meeting, based on his discussions with players.
The Tribune-Review stands by the original report.
> > Defenseman Kris Letang might rejoin the lineup later this week, he said yesterday after skating with teammates for the first time since his Nov. 26 concussion.
"We'll see how the week goes," he said at Consol Energy Center.
Letang suffered dizziness, nausea and headaches after absorbing a hit nearly two months ago in Montreal. Letang said that during his recovery he was treated for two weeks by Dr. Francois Chaput, a Canadian chiropractor and concussion specialist. Now symptom-free, Letang has been cleared for game action, but will progress cautiously.
"Obviously, we don't want to rush it," he said. "I've had a lot of discussion with (general manager Ray Shero) and the coaches. We'll make a decision when I'm going to be ready."
Letang has missed 21 games. The Penguins play Thursday in New York against the Rangers, and then return home for games Friday against Montreal and Sunday versus Washington.
"I want to play as quick as I can play," he said.
> > Right wing Arron Asham was scratched from last night's game with an illness.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.