Penguins make the call to minor leagues for winger Tangradi
The Penguins recalled left wing Eric Tangradi from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, and he played on the fourth line against the New York Rangers on Tuesday.
Tangradi's promotion came as something of a surprise, as none of the Penguins' forwards had sustained injuries Sunday in Buffalo. Coach Dan Bylsma said Tangradi's size and ability to deliver punishing hits could be useful in the Penguins' lineup.
"We feel that our third and fourth lines need that presence," Bylsma said.
Tangradi has been the subject of trade rumors for years but disregarded the possibility that he could be leaving the organization soon.
"Once you get into pro hockey," Tangradi said, "you realize it's a business. Part of a business is dealing with different distractions."
> > Defenseman Brooks Orpik did not play Tuesday night because of what the Penguins called an "upper-body" injury, which apparently took place Sunday. Bylsma said he does not believe the injury is serious. Orpik, who recently has undergone two abdominal surgeries, was replaced in the lineup by Ben Lovejoy.
> > Goaltender Brent Johnson was unavailable against the Rangers because of an illness. He was replaced by the Penguins' regular AHL starter, Brad Thiessen.
> > Rangers left wing Mike Rupp, who played the previous two seasons with the Penguins, apologized to center Jordan Staal via text message in the days following Staal's knee injury Jan. 7. Rupp used his knee to hit Staal in the knee, tearing Staal's left MCL.
> > Centers Dustin Jeffrey and Cal O'Reilly were healthy scratches Tuesday night.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.