Pens' goaltending rotation is taking shape
UNIONDALE, N.Y. — The Penguins' goaltending rotation — or lack thereof — is starting to take shape. Brad Thiessen was sent back to Wilkes-Barre/Scranton on Thursday after taking part in the morning skate. Brent Johnson, following a monthlong knee problem, has returned as Marc-Andre Fleury's backup and might play Friday night in Buffalo.
Fleury, who has participated in 64 games, said he is not fatigued and would be willing to play in every game remaining in the regular season.
"I feel good now," Fleury said. "So I just go one day at a time, one game at a time. I don't think too far ahead."
Bylsma said he has confidence in Johnson and his balky knee.
"He wouldn't be backing up if he wasn't able to play," Bylsma said.
> > Islanders defenseman Dylan Reese, an Upper St. Clair native, is asserting himself as an NHL regular. Reese played in his 25th game of the season, and perhaps even more impressive is the manner in which the Islanders coaching staff is using him. Reese is receiving extended minutes while playing with New York's best defenseman, Mark Streit.
"I feel like I'm playing really good hockey, like I'm more comfortable here now," Reese said.
Reese is one of two Islanders defensemen who has a plus-minus mark that is even or better.
> > Defenseman Matt Niskanen, who wasn't expected to travel on the Penguins' two-game road trip, took part in the morning skate and an extended, on-ice workout afterward. He isn't expected to play Friday night but likely will return to the lineup soon.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.