Vitale may face Flyers' wrath for hit on Briere
• Penguins center Joe Vitale considers today's game a "fresh start," but the Flyers might not so quickly forget his hit on Danny Briere that sparked fights last Sunday. Either way, the Penguins are prepared. "We really don't know what there is (waiting) for Joe," Penguins forward Craig Adams said, "but I don't think Joe should worry about anything. He didn't do anything wrong, and he's going to have a lot of guys watching his back." Among them will be Steve MacIntyre, who was recalled Friday from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton. The 6-foot-6, 265-pound forward is known for his fighting skills. "I expect a hard-fought battle," Vitale said. "Both teams are not playing for much, but (we can) set a tone for the playoff series." Regardless of today's outcome, the Penguins will be a No. 4 seed in the Stanley Cup playoffs with the Flyers seeded fifth. They'll begin a seven-game series next week at Consol Energy Center. With little to gain, Penguins coach Dan Bylsma could sit some of his top players. The team's lineup — including the starting goalie — won't be announced until just before the game, he said.
• The NHL did not discipline defenseman Brooks Orpik for kneeing the Rangers' Derek Stepan in Thursday's third period. Bylsma said after practice yesterday that league officials had not spoken with Orpik, and the coach did not believe they would. Rangers coach John Tortorella wanted the NHL to punish Orpik.
• James Neal, Steve Sullivan, Arron Asham and Matt Niskanen did not take part in yesterday's practice at Southpointe. Neal (lower-body injury), Sullivan (lower-body) and Niskanen (upper-body) did not play Thursday. Bylsma provided no update on their injuries, but none of the three was expected to return before the playoffs. Asham's absence was not explained.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.