Notebook: Castillo replaced by Sanchez
Second baseman Jose Castillo was not in the starting lineup for the Pirates against the New York Mets on Tuesday. Castillo was replaced by Freddy Sanchez, who batted fifth. Though Castillo had hit safely in seven consecutive games, he is seemingly falling into the habit of trying to pull the ball -- something he tried to do at the end of April, when he struggled at the plate.
Joe Randa started at third in place of Castillo. Randa was batting .300 with a home run and 3 RBI in limited action since being reinstated from the disabled list on June 13. He was 3 for 5 with an RBI yesterday.
Jose Hernandez missed his second consecutive game due to a sore lower back. The infielder/outfielder is expected to be available for today's game.
Sanchez appeared on ESPN2's "Cold Pizza" prior to yesterday's game. The appearance was originally scheduled to promote Sanchez for the All-Star Game as the possible "final man" on the National League roster. Sanchez, however, was selected to the All-Star squad by NL manager Phil Garner -- so Sanchez instead used the national television forum to talk up Pittsburgh and what it means for him to be playing in an All-Star Game hosted by his home park.
With his double in the fourth inning, starting pitcher Zach Duke has now hit safely in six of his past seven games. He is batting .257 this season.
Manager Jim Tracy will ring the opening bell today for the commodities market at the New York Stock Exchange.
Jason Bay's 62 RBI are the most by a Pirates player before the All-Star break since Aramis Ramirez's 62 in 2003.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.