Shortstop Jack Wilson will be activated from the disabled list Tuesday, when the Pirates begin a three-game series in Cincinnati. Wilson has been out since April 3, when he strained his right calf in a game against Atlanta. Today, Wilson will play the final game of his rehab assignment with Double-A Altoona.
Rookie Brian Bixler, who has not started a game since last Tuesday, will be sent back to Triple-A Indianapolis when Wilson returns. Bixler made 24 starts at short for the Pirates and hit .175 with two RBI.
The Pirates, who have the second overall pick in the June 5 draft, have narrowed their candidate pool to five players. The top three, in no particular order, are Vanderbilt third baseman Pedro Alvarez, Griffin (Ga.) High shortstop Tim Beckham and Florida State catcher Buster Posey.
Alvarez, who has been rated as the top prospect in the draft, will be advised by Scott Boras and reportedly wants an $8 million signing bonus. General manager Neal Huntington said there is no mandate from ownership to limit the Pirates' picks based on signability.
"If Player 1 on our list wants three times what Player 2 on our list wants, we have to take that into consideration," Huntington said. "But we're not going to be scared away by any particular agent or signing bonus request."
Jason Bay's game-winning single in the 14th inning Saturday was the first walk-off hit of his career.
13 -- Errors by Pirates shortstops in 47 games while Jack Wilson has been on the DL.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.