Bucs' Capps avoids trip to disabled list
CHICAGO — Pirates closer Matt Capps, making a dramatic recovery from a scary-looking injury, will not have to go on the disabled list.
"I don't think I ever thought about the disabled list," manager John Russell said Wednesday. "We didn't think it was going to be a two-week thing. He felt good enough to play some catch today, and that's a great sign."
Capps was struck by a line drive on his right elbow during Monday night's game against the Chicago Cubs. The ball ricocheted toward the Cubs' dugout, and the near-sellout crowd fell into a hush as Capps was helped off the field in obvious pain.
Late yesterday morning, Capps tested his bruised elbow by throwing long toss — about 25 throws from 120 feet on flat ground — at Wrigley Field.
"No pain right now," Capps said about a half-hour after his workout. "It felt pretty good (throwing). We'll see how it feels tomorrow. Hopefully, I'll be able to throw off a mound tomorrow."
The Pirates are off today, but Capps will attempt a side session at PNC Park. If Capps doesn't have much residual pain and stiffness after the workout, he should be game-ready within a couple of days.
Russell said he did not expect Capps to be available Friday, when the Pirates open a three-game home series against the Houston Astros.
Left-hander John Grabow will fill in as the closer until Capps returns. Russell also said he was encouraged by how the rest of the bullpen has stepped up its performance during the just-completed, 10-game road trip.
"They've come a long way," Russell said. "(Jesse) Chavez has done a great job. Evan Meek has been more consistent. (Tom) Gorzelanny has done a nice job in that role."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.