The Pirates appear to be in good hands.
Allegheny General Hospital sports medicine specialist Dr. Edward Snell recently received the 2009 Team Physician Award from the Pennsylvania Athletic Trainers' Society, an award that recognizes 15 or more years of team physician achievement and athletic training support in Pennsylvania.
Snell, the director of the Primary Sports Medicine Fellowship at AGH, has been the Pirates' head team physician for 10 years under medical director Dr. Patrick DeMeo.
"It's really an honor," said Snell, 47, who lives in McCandless with his wife and two daughters. "I'm glad they're recognizing physicians who are stepping up to the plate, backing them and backing the issues in taking care of young athletes and professional athletes.
"It's good to be recognized for all the stuff we do. It's good to get an award like this."
The award is the second in five months for Snell, who DeMeo recruited from Cleveland 15 years ago. In March, Snell was elected President of the Major League Baseball Team Physician's Association.
He helps head a Pirates training staff -- three with the major-league club and 12 in the minor leagues -- that Baseball Prospectus labeled in November as the best in professional baseball.
In addition to his work with the Pirates and Major League Baseball, Snell also serves as medical director for the Athletic Training Education Program at Duquesne. He's a team physician for several area high schools and is a member of the Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association's Sports Medicine Advisory Committee.
"It's a challenging career," Snell said. "It's been extremely self-satisfyinig to do what I do."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.