The Pirates kicked off the search for their next manager on Tuesday by interviewing former Cleveland Indians skipper Eric Wedge.
General manager Neal Huntington, who had been in Bradenton, Fla., for organizational meetings, flew to Pittsburgh late Monday night to conduct Wedge's interview at PNC Park. Huntington will remain in town the rest of this week to interview at least one more candidate.
Phil Garner, who played for the Pirates from 1977-81, also is believed to be interested in the job. Garner, 61, has managed the MIlwaukee Brewers (1992-99), Detroit Tigers (2000-02) and Houston Astros (2004-07). He guided the Astros to the National League pennant in 2005.
According to a team spokesman, the Pirates will announce who has been interviewed after each session is complete but will not make any futher comment.
Wedge's interview was held one day after John Russell was fired.
Wedge, 42, was twice named manager of the year in the minors. He managed the Indians from 2003-09 and compiled a 561-573 record. Wedge was named American League manager of the year in 2007, when the Indians went 96-66 and advanced to the ALCS, where they lost in seven games against the Boston Red Sox.
Cleveland began turning over its roster — trading away veterans for prospects, as the Pirates have done — and Wedge was fired following the '09 season.
The Chicago Cubs and Toronto Blue Jays, who also are searching for new managers, have interviewed Wedge in recent weeks.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.