McCutchen, Bucs no closer on contract extension
The Pirates and center fielder Andrew McCutchen have made no progress toward a multiyear contract extension since they last talked in April.
The sides had been discussing the extension for several months before word of the negotiations became public in early May. There have been no new approaches from either side in the interim, even though both are believed to remain open to an agreement.
Pirates president Frank Coonelly declined comment Saturday, citing club policy on contract matters.
McCutchen's salary is $452,500, but that means little in this context. Teams can assign any salary they wish to a player in his first three years in the majors above the minimum $414,500. The player then is eligible for salary arbitration the next three years before he can declare free agency. The latter would come in 2016 for McCutchen, based on his current status.
The Pirates and McCutchen had discussed a contract that would buy out a year or two of McCutchen's free-agency time, either through guaranteed money or a club option. That appears to still be on the table for both sides, but money is the separator.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Starkey: Pirates’ trade of Snider still reeks
- Pirates pitcher Cole climbing list with each consecutive win
- Gameday: Pirates vs. Reds, May 5, 2015
- Sawchik: Should Pirates be concerned about their defense?
- Pirates suffer 3rd straight walk-off loss in St. Louis in 14 innings
- Pirates notebook: Lack of clutch hits strands offense
- Pirates notebook: Cool start in April typical for McCutchen
- Biertempfel: Despite Wainwright injury, Cardinals still considered favorite in NL Central
- Pirates notebook: Another Korean Baseball Organization star on Pirates’ radar