Pirates infielder Harrison fine after collision
Pirates third baseman Josh Harrison said that Astros catcher Carlos Corporan wasn't blocking the back part of home plate when he first planned to slide in the bottom of the second inning Monday afternoon.
But then Corporan started to come back, and Harrison changed the angle of his body -- he thinks.
"To be honest, I don't even know what happened," Harrison said. "I just know I was sliding and he was about to block it. I think as he was coming back to tag me, my face was ahead of my body and it kind of went into his shoulder. That would be my guess."
The nose-to-shoulder collision forced Harrison out of the game with dizziness the next inning, but he said that he passed concussion tests administered Tuesday and was cleared to play last night, although he did not start the game.
"I'm feeling a lot better," he said yesterday. "Ran through tests, did some early work running and throwing, and everything checked out. I guess they'll get me back in when they feel ready."
Harrison made the third out of the inning and took the field to start the third. He made two errors, and said that he started to feel dizzy after he flied out to right field and ran to second in the bottom of the inning. He informed the staff of his condition, then came out of the game.
"(The dizziness didn't stop until) after I came in and the doctor looked at me," said Harrison, who still had a swollen nose and split lip yesterday. "It took a little time after winding down out of my adrenaline. After a while it kind of went away, and the only thing was the nose kept bleeding."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.