Pitchers Morton, Hanrahan sign 1-year contracts with Pirates
The Pirates on Monday signed starter Charlie Morton and closer Joel Hanrahan to one-year contracts, avoiding salary arbitration with both pitchers.
Hanrahan will make $4.1 million; Morton, $2.445 million.
Hanrahan, 30, also can make up to $50,000 in performance bonuses, based on games finished. He'll get $10,000 each if he finishes 40 and 45 games. He'll get $15,000 each if he finishes 50 and 60 games.
Last year, Hanrahan made $1.4 million and put himself in line for a significant raise by earning his first All-Star berth. The right-hander finished 59 games and racked up 40 saves, the third-highest single-season total in Pirates history.
Morton, 28, made $441,000 last season and went 10-10 with a 3.83 ERA in 29 starts. He led the staff with 171 2⁄3 innings pitched and was second in wins behind Kevin Correia.
The Pirates have four arbitration-eligible players yet to sign: pitchers Evan Meek and Jeff Karstens, and infielders Casey McGehee and Garrett Jones.
The deadline to settle contracts without formally beginning the arbitration process is midnight tonight. On Wednesday, teams and unsigned players must publicly exchange contract figures. If a case goes to a hearing, a board of arbiters will choose one of the two figures submitted.
The Pirates previously avoided arbitration by signing relievers Jason Grilli ($1.1 million) and Chris Resop ($850,000).
The club is on track for an Opening Day payroll of about $47 million for all players on the 40-man roster.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.