UConn basketball player works out for Steelers
The Steelers' exhaustive efforts to examine all possible prospects, from first-rounders to rookie free agents in advance of this weekend's NFL draft, included a Connecticut basketball player.
Blame it on Antonio Gates.
The Chargers landed Gates, the former basketball player from Kent State. The Steelers may wind up with UConn's Ed Nelson.
The Steelers were one of 14 teams to attend Nelson's workout last Friday, his first foray into football since his freshman season at St. Thomas Aquinas High School in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
Since then, Nelson has played for Georgia Tech and UConn, averaging 3.1 points and 2.6 rebounds in 60 career games.
Nelson is better known for his relentless mean streak than for his scoring off the bench.
At 6-foot-6 and 260 pounds, he hopes to garner interest as a potential tight end. But Nelson was unpolished in his workout.
Still, he "passed the test," according to agent Joe Linta, a Freedom native. Linta anticipates Nelson ending up in somebody's camp as a rookie free agent.
Linta said Nelson tested well physically, other than running a 4.95 and a 5.0 in the 40-yard dash.
The Steelers have also scouted 6-7, 275-pound center/forward Jai Lewis of George Mason.
Notes : The Steelers announced the re-signing of veteran safety Mike Logan, 31, on Tuesday to a one-year contract. Logan is coming off surgery following a knee injury he suffered during Super Bowl XL. Wide receiver Sean Morey and linebacker Arnold Harrison also signed one-year deals. ... The Steelers have shown interest in several potential (non-first-round) picks, including Hofstra guard Willie Colon, Pitt offensive lineman Charles Spencer, Virginia Tech tight end Jeff King, Virginia quarterback Marques Hagans and Colorado receiver/returner Jeremy Bloom.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.