ShareThis Page

Roethlisberger rejects new helmet

| Thursday, Aug. 3, 2006

"The Revolution" has been rejected by Big Ben.

After further review, Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger won't be experimenting with the Riddell Revolution helmet, as he had initially intended in training camp.

Instead, he'll be sticking with his standard Riddell VSR 4.

"We tried it on, and we didn't like it," Roethlisberger said of the Revolution. "You have to look almost through the face mask.

"My vision is a lot smaller, so we're just going to stay with (the one he's been using)."

The Revolution's protection extends an additional 3 to 4 inches around the jaw on each side, Steelers equipment manager Rodgers Freyvogel said.

Linebackers Joey Porter and James Farrior and nose tackle Casey Hampton are among current Steelers who have switched to the Revolution since its introduction two seasons ago.

"No helmets can prevent concussions," Freyvogel said. "This is one that they made that they think is the best at preventing concussions."

Indianapolis Colts quarterback Payton Manning also wears the Revolution.

"He's really, really comfortable in that VSR 4," Freyvogel said of Roethlisberger. "And he's the one that has to go out there and play."

Steelers coach Bill Cowher is content to let Roethlisberger make his own call to wear what he prefers.

"If he's happy, I'm happy," Cowher said.

Roethlisberger required seven hours of facial reconstruction after his involvement in a motorcycle accident June 12.

"The best protection isn't the newest technology in helmets or shoulder pads; It's my offensive line," Roethlisberger said. "Those guys are the best in the business. I'm a lucky guy."

Roethlisberger hasn't attached a chin strap to his VSR 4 yet.

"No point," he said. "Just like my rib pads, I don't put my rib pads on until game time."

Additional Information:

Complete coverage

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.