Penguins re-sign Talbot, Christensen; schedule more Crosby talks
While contract talks with their premier center will pick up next week, the Penguins secured depth at that position today by signing Maxime Talbot and Erik Christensen to multi-year deals.
Talbot and Christensen were each restricted free agents and would have been eligible for arbitration had they not agreed to deals by 5 p.m. Their signings leave the Penguins with just three remaining restricted free agents: right wing Colby Armstrong, center Tim Brent and defenseman Ryan Lannon.
Talbot and Christensen each agreed to two-year deals. Talbot will earn $650,000 this season and $700,000 in 2008-09. Terms of Christensen's deal were not yet known.
Christensen, 23, tallied 18 goals and recorded 15 assist this past season. He tied for the NHL-lead with eight shootout goals. His agent, Craig Oster, also represents Armstrong and was attempting to close a multi-year between Armstrong and the Penguins prior to the arbitration deadline.
Arbitration-eligible players are free to sign with their respective clubs until their hearing.
Talbot, 23, scored 13 goals and recorded 24 points this past season.
Talbot is represented by agent Pat Brisson, who also counts Sidney Crosby among his clients. The Penguins plan to sign Crosby to a long-term extension this summer. Crosby's entry-level deal will expire after this season. Brisson and Pittsburgh general manage Ray Shero have agreed to resume contract talks early next week.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.