ShareThis Page

Steelers may sign Najeh Davenport

| Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2008

Najeh Davenport worked out for the Steelers this morning and he could sign with his former team today.

Coach Mike Tomlin said the Steelers will sign two running backs in advance of this Sunday's game at Jacksonville to address an alarming lack of depth at the position.

The Steelers will be without starting running back Willie Parker (sprained knee) against the Jaguars, Tomlin said today at his weekly news conference, and Rashard Mendenhall is out for the season with a fractured shoulder.

Carey Davis, who didn't finish the Steelers' 23-20 overtime win against the Ravens Monday because of a sprained ankle, could play against the Jaguars.

Davis and Mewelde Moore are the only running backs on the 53-man roster that are capable of playing against the Jaguars.

In addition to Davenport, who served as Parker's backup the previous two seasons, the Steelers could sign Gary Russell from their practice squad.

Russell had been on the Steeler' 53-man roster through the first two weeks of the season but the team released him prior to their Sept. 21 game at Philadelphia and later re-signed him to the practice squad.

In other injury news, the Steelers will again be without starting nose tackle Casey Hampton (groin) and starting defensive end Brett Keisel (calf). In addition to Mendenhall the Steelers the place will starting right guard Kendall Simmons, who ruptured his Achilees heel against the Ravens, on injured reserve.

Tomlin said Darnell Stapleton, who filled in for Simmons Monday night, and Trai Essex will compete for the starting job at right guard.

Tomlin said the team has not ruled out giving starting right tackle Willie Colon a look at right guard but added that Stapleton or Essex is the short-term solution for now.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.