Dukes' Jackson begins NBA quest
College Football Videos
Duquesne's Aaron Jackson, who had a 46-point performance in his final college game, has been invited to the Portsmouth Invitational Tournament for NBA Draft hopefuls.
The Virginia-based event, which will be held April 8-11, always draws numerous NBA scouts. And with the NBA overhauling the evaluation process by eliminating certain pre-draft tournaments, Portsmouth's importance will be magnified.
"I'm excited about the opportunity to attend Portsmouth," said Jackson, a 6-foot-4 point guard. "It's another chance for me to display my skills."
Duquesne coach Ron Everhart coached a future NBA player when he had Jose Juan Barea (Dallas Mavericks) at Northeastern. Perhaps he'll have another in Jackson.
"My ultimate goal is the NBA," Jackson said. "A lot of people I talk to — scouts, workout guys — tell me not to try and do things I haven't been doing all along. They tell me to just play my game, and that's what I'm going to do when I go to Portsmouth. I don't feel any pressure to do things any differently."
Jackson, who is in the process of hiring an agent, said he is excited about the feedback he's been getting, listing contacts from the Cleveland Cavaliers, Detroit Pistons, Oklahoma City Thunder and Houston Rockets.
Official rosters for the eight-team Portsmouth tournament won't be released until early next month, but Jackson was told he'll compete on a team that includes guards Jimmy Baron of Rhode Island, Courtney Fells of North Carolina State, Stefon Jackson of Texas-El Paso, Jack McClinton of Miami and Ronald Steele of Alabama, and forwards Robert Dozier of Memphis and Kevin Rogers of Baylor.
Jackson averaged 19.3 points, 5.7 assists and 5.5 rebounds for Duquesne this season. In his final game, against Virginia Tech in the NIT, he scored 46 in a 116-108 double-overtime loss.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.