ShareThis Page

Pirates' starter Ian Snell running out of time

| Thursday, June 25, 2009

Ian Snell is clinging -- just barely -- to his spot in the Pirates' rotation.

Snell will make his next scheduled start Sunday against the Kansas City Royals. After that, nothing is certain.

After being bounced in the third inning Tuesday against the Cleveland Indians, Snell is 2-8 with a 5.36 ERA. The right-hander has one minor-league option remaining.

"At some point, we're going to have to make a decision about, do we continue with him in the rotation, do we put him in the bullpen or do we option him and see if we can get those adjustments made down there?" general manager Neal Huntington said Wednesday.

"It's not like it's do-or-die in his next start. But at some point, we've got to see the performance carry from the bullpen to the field. We need to see him execute."

Sinking slowly
Ian Snell's stats under three different pitching coaches:
Season Coach W-L ERA IP H BB SO
2006 Colborn 14-11 4.74 186.0 198 74 169
2007 Colborn 9-12 3.76 208.0 209 68 177
2008 Andrews 7-12 5.42 164.1 201 89 135
2009 Kerrigan 2-8 5.36 80.2 87 44 52

Last year, the Pirates waited until July 5 before optioning inconsistent lefty Tom Gorzelanny to Triple-A Indianapolis. Gorzelanny returned for a brief stint in the bullpen this season before being sent back to Indy's rotation.

Management is pleased with the side work Snell has been doing with pitching coach Joe Kerrigan. But they want Snell to consistently attack the inner half of the plate with strikes instead of nibbling with pitches outside the strike zone.

"The things we try to emphasize to all our young starting pitchers is to control what you can control, and consistency," Huntington said. "Consistency of your routine, your preparation, how you go about your process, your pre-pitch, your post-pitch, your pregame, your postgame.

"In Ian's case, sometimes the consistency of the preparation and the routine and the execution escapes him. He gets worried about things which are beyond his control."

Snell is working with his third pitching coach in as many seasons. In 2007 under coach Jim Colborn, Snell went 9-12 with a career-best 3.76 ERA and a career-high 177 strikeouts after going 14-11 with a 4.74 ERA and 169 strikeouts in the prior season.

"Colborn was more laid back, 'Go out there and get 'em,' " Snell said. "Last year (under Jeff Andrews), it was too much strategy. 'You've got to do this and do that. You've got to keep 'em thinking.' Joe (Kerrigan) is a little bit of both, so it's a little bit confusing.

"Three different pitching coaches, three different mechanical things. I think I've changed more than anybody on this team, mechanics-wise. It's been a struggle for me."

Kerrigan recently helped Snell revert to many of his previous mechanics that made him successful in 2007. The changes seemed to aid Snell's confidence, if not his statistics.

"Sometimes, I feel like if I could just be left alone and not have to worry so much about what I have to do mechanically or where I throw the ball, I'd be fine," Snell said.

"I'm not going to change (mechanics) anymore. I'm not going to be a (jerk) about it, but I'm tired of people telling me, 'Change this, change that.' Let me go out there and just throw the ball where I want as hard as possible, like I used to."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me