The Penguins have a long history of showcasing some of the most flashy players in NHL history.
Now, they can showcase some flashy jewelry.
Penguins players and officials gathered Tuesday in a private ceremony at The LeMont restaurant on Mt. Washington.
The players showed off the enormous rings, expressing disbelief at how impressive they are. Each one is loaded with 167 diamonds, the player's name, an image of the Stanley Cup and the Penguins' logo.
"It's very impressive," captain Sidney Crosby said. "I probably won't wear it too often, but it's great."
The players were awarded the rings in numerical order, which forced superstars Crosby and Evgeni Malkin to wait until everyone else had received one.
"That drove me nuts," Crosby said. "But it was worth it."
Bill Guerin, who won a Stanley Cup with the New Jersey Devils in 1995, said there is no comparison between the rings.
"In today's day and age, size matters," he said. "Back then was a different time, a different era."
The gathering marked the final celebration in what has been a whirlwind offseason for the Penguins.
Although the players were thrilled with the ceremony, they are ready for the season to begin.
"Now it's time to get down to business," Guerin said.
Those who were members of last season's team but have moved on will receive their rings later this season.
Team owners Mario Lemieux and Ron Burkle and GM Ray Shero presented the players with the rings. Those three, along with coach Dan Bylsma, played a role in the ring design.
"It was like everything else since I have been here," Guerin said. "It was first class all the way."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.