ShareThis Page

Steelers safety Polamalu doesn't practice, likely out against Ravens

| Friday, Nov. 27, 2009

Troy Polamalu didn't practice Thursday and is unlikely to play Sunday in Baltimore.

Polamalu didn't play against the Kansas City Chiefs last Sunday because of a strained ligament in his left knee.

Left guard Chris Kemoeatu (knee) and quarterback Charlie Batch (wrist) are already out for the 8:20 p.m. game against the Ravens.

Defensive end Travis Kirschke's status for the game is uncertain as he again was a limited participant in practice. Kirschke has missed the Steelers' last three games because of a strained calf.

Running back Willie Parker (hip) was also limited in practice yesterday.

• Outside linebacker Terrell Suggs (knee) missed practice again yesterday. He is questionable at best to play against the Steelers.

Also not practicing yesterday for the Ravens were safety Ed Reed (foot) and linebacker Ray Lewis (foot).

Neither player has practiced this week.

Defensive tackle Haloti Ngata (ankle) was a limited participant in practice.

• New cornerback Corey Ivy on how covering kicks is about desire: "I'd say (desire is) about 85 percent. It's not a glory position. There's not a position where you can stand out — except if you're the returner — so it's a lot of want-to and a lot of dirty work that I just consider as part of my job description."

Ivy and linebacker Rocky Boiman were signed earlier this week to help shore up the Steelers' kickoff coverage unit.

The Steelers have given up four kickoff returns for touchdowns in their past five games.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.