ShareThis Page

Ward says Roethlisberger needs to address team

| Saturday, June 26, 2010

MOUNT LAUREL, N.J. -- Steelers wide receiver Hines Ward said the Ben Roethlisberger questions he and teammates have faced during the offseason are "tiring" and the Steelers need to move past the scrutiny generated by the franchise quarterback's boorish behavior.

"Everywhere we go, we're all affected as teammates, because we're always asked about it," Ward said. "For us, it can get monotonous."

Ward told the NFL Network that Roethlisberger needs to address the team about his off-the-field missteps.

The 13th-year veteran told the Tribune-Review, however, that it is up to Roethlisberger if he wants to talk to teammates about the events that led to a four- to six-game suspension at the start of the 2010 season.

"To be honest, I don't really know the situation and I don't want to know because at the end of the day I know he's not playing for us (at the start of the season) so it's something that him, his family, they have to deal with that," Ward said. "We're going to be there as teammates and show our support if he needs us. I think if everyone comes at him, 'Are you OK• Are you OK?' That can be a burden on him. I'd rather him open up to us if he wants to talk."

Roethlisberger has vowed to change and make amends for the behavior that nearly sabotaged his Steelers career.

"You look at it as a role model, you can't put yourself in situations," Ward said. "We all like to have a good time but in the back of your mind you've got to be like, 'Look, I can't do nothing too crazy because of who I represent.' "

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.