Pirates open the books to show profits
By Rob Biertempfel
Published: Sunday, Aug. 22, 2010,
About two-thirds of the Pirates' $29.4 million net income from 2007 and 2008 was paid to the ownership group to help pay taxes and fulfill loan interest payments.
This afternoon, the ballclub released selected information from its audited financial statements from 2007, 2008 and 2009, which shows a total payout of $20.443 million its partners. The payouts were approved by a vote of the Pirates' board of directors.
The family of principal owner Bob Nutting received a total of $9.604 million via two payments in December 2007 and July 2008. That money covered the interest due on a loan the family made to the franchise in 2003.
Under the terms of the loan, the Nuttings could have gotten an increased share of ownership instead of a cash payment. But the minority owners did not want to give up even more of their stakes.
Also in two payments, coming in January 2008 and April 2008, the Pirates distributed $10.839 million to its partners for tax liabilities in 2006 and 2007. Those payments were made after some members of the partnership group insisted the team help them pay their annual federal and state taxes on the team's profits.
The Pirates had a net income of $15 million in 2007, $14.4 million in 2008 and $5.4 million in 2009.
The two payouts in 2008 are the only times the Pirates have paid dividends to their partners. Nutting, who is chairman of the board, prefers not to make dividend payments to the partners. Rather, Nutting wants profits to remain within the franchise to pay for long-term expenditures — such as capital improvements, increased budgets for scouting and player development and increased player payroll.
Nutting, who does not draw a salary, emphasized ownership is not lining its pockets with the team's profits. He also has denied the revenue has been used for any of the Nutting family's other businesses, such as the Wheeling, W. Va.- based Ogden Newspapers or Seven Springs Mountain Resort.
"I really believe we are doing the right thing for the club," Nutting said. "I know we are acting honorably. I really believe what we're going through is worth it. If I didn't, there'd be no reason to put up with the agony — not only the on-field performance this year, but the public lashing we take."
The team's decision to release some of its financial information does not signal a change from its previous refusal to open its books for public inspection. Rather, according to president Frank Coonelly, it's a response to the leak of the team's financial statements for 2007 and '08 to The Associated Press.
"After a period in which the club incurred large losses, the club has operated on a sound financial basis over the last several years," Coonelly said.
The Pirates have turned a profit every year since 2004. The team was in the black by about $25 million in 2006, when it had a $46.7 million payroll and PNC Park played host to the All-Star Game.
In December, Coonelly said the Pirates had put all their revenue into capital investments, such as a $5.4 million academy in the Dominican Republic, a $2 million renovation of Pirate City in Bradenton, Fla., and various improvements at PNC Park.
The Pirates' payroll has dropped steadily over the past four seasons. It went from $51.4 million in 2007 to $50.7 million in 2008 to $49 million in 2009 to its current $39 million. The team slashed payroll by trading away more expensive, veteran players such as Jason Bay, Adam LaRoche, Xavier Nady, Jack Wilson, Freddy Sanchez and John Grabow.
Coonelly admitted that the team would not have turned a profit last year if players such as Wilson and Sanchez had not been traded.
"We did not feel compelled to make those trades," Coonelly said. "We felt they made sense (from a baseball standpoint). We had budgeted close to the break-even point."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.