Former Penguins defenseman Alex Goligoski, traded to Dallas on Tuesday afternoon, joked that he knew rooting for his beloved Green Bay Packers in the Super Bowl "would come back to haunt me."
Second among Penguins defensemen with 31 points, Goligoski, 25, hopes to fuel the Stars' push for a Stanley Cup playoff spot.
"I'm going to have to learn the system quick," he said. "I know how I can fit right in is by playing a big role in getting Dallas to the playoffs." Goligoski spoke to the Tribune-Review during a snowy drive to Pittsburgh International Airport:
When did you first get wind of this trade being a possibility?
Just this afternoon. I wasn't really sure what was going on. I knew if the Pens were going to make a trade, I was likely one of the guys. It's just kind of with the way the team was set up in terms of strengths and needs. ... I wasn't too uptight about it or thinking about it too much. It wasn't that big of a burden on me.
You knew the situation with the Penguins - four defensemen on long-term deals, you at shorter term. Did you enter this season expecting to finish it as a Penguin?
I never looked at it like that. I knew that I was a main trading chip, I guess you could say. It was just a matter of them getting an offer they liked.
How will you look back on your brief, but not unmemorable, Penguins career?
It was great. Everything was great. The Cup, obviously, was the best. I played on some great teams here. The organization was great, right down the list. They were very good to me.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.