Nutting says attendance will not affect Pirates' payroll
BRADENTON, Fla. — Pirates owner Bob Nutting on Thursday insisted that a possible future payroll increase will not depend on an increase in fan attendance.
"We're not artificially handicapped by extreme limitations on dollars, as we have been in the past," Nutting said. "I don't see there being an artificial constraint as we move forward."
The Pirates' player payroll this year will be about $50 million, the second-lowest in the majors. Last year's Opening Day payroll was $39 million, down from $48 million in 2009.
The team drew 1.613 million fans last year at PNC Park. Attendance was 1.577 million in 2009 and 1.609 million in 2008.
In a recent interview with a website devoted to Pirates coverage, president Frank Coonelly was asked if the franchise can afford an $80 million payroll. Coonelly responded:
"Today, no, but we will be able to support that payroll very soon if our fans believe that we now have a group of players in Pittsburgh and on its way here in the near future that is competitive. We need to take a meaningful step forward in terms of attendance to reach that payroll number while continuing to invest heavily in our future, but I am convinced that the attendance will move quickly once we convince our fans that we are on the right track."
Coonelly yesterday declined to elaborate.
Nutting said payroll increases will not hinge on increased attendance. He added that he expects more fans will show up as the team improves, which will require a higher payroll.
"I don't want to speculate and pick a number (for payroll)," Nutting said. "What's critically important is that we are in a position to allocate every year the dollars needed to have a competitive team on the field.
"In the past several years we've been intensely focused on the draft and infusing talent into the system. Those were very appropriate allocations."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.