'Prince' Ben gets ready for his royal wedding
Pittsburgh's version of the royal wedding is set to take place in a little less than a month.
And even Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger is aware that his upcoming nuptials have drawn comparisons, albeit on a smaller scale, to the ones that took place two months ago and featured an English prince.
"I've heard that," Roethlisberger said Friday.
Roethlisberger is scheduled to marry Ashley Harlan of New Castle on July 23 — roughly a week before Steelers training camp if it starts on time. Like the royal couple before their wedding two months ago, Roethlisberger and his fiancee have been guarded with the details.
Roethlisberger declined to reveal where the service and reception will be held. He invited all of his teammates to the wedding, and when asked if any of them are in the wedding, he chuckled and said, "Maybe."
Roethlisberger did say that he asked his father, Ken, to be his best man — and got turned down.
"I asked him to be, but he respectfully (declined)," Roethlisberger said with a laugh. "My sister's going to be in her bridal party, so my mom would be sitting here alone, so he said if it's OK with me he'd prefer to sit with her, and I said, 'That's absolutely fine.' "
Harlan has largely stayed out of the spotlight since news of her engagement to Roethlisberger surfaced last season. A tall, trim blond, Harlan attended the youth football camp that Roethlisberger held last Tuesday at Seneca Valley but only as a spectator.
Roethlisberger said he has not experienced any pre-wedding jitters, and when asked if he is having a bachelor party, he laughed.
"I am not," he said. "I had one probably two weeks ago. It was 36 holes at Firestone (Country Club in Ohio). It was great."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.