ShareThis Page

Overbay expects boos in Toronto

| Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Pirates first baseman Lyle Overbay expects to get what he said is "the normal" reaction from Blue Jays fans when he returns to Toronto tonight.

"They booed Marco Scutaro and he's a pretty good player, so ..." said Overbay, who played for the Blue Jays from 2006-10. "They're gonna boo the other team. That's the way they are. They're passionate. I don't expect anything different."

Then again, how much noise can a small crowd make?

In the early 1990s, the Blue Jays were a tough ticket. This year, however, Toronto averages 20,907 fans per home game. That ranks 25th in the majors and is three spots below the Pirates (22,543).

The Blue Jays averaged more than 49,000 fans in 1992 and more than 50,000 in 1993, the years they won back-to-back World Series.

Overbay said baseball's work stoppage in 1994-95 "killed" fan interest in Toronto.

"Ever since the strike, it's been bad," Overbay said. "Those kids who boycotted it back then, now they have kids and they're still boycotting it."

Attendance bounced back in other major league towns after the strike. Why not Toronto?

"I'm assuming just because of their values," Overbay said. "I don't know. They're not as forgiving as Americans, I guess. It's personal for them, and they're sticking to it."

Overbay batted .268 with a .796 OPS in five seasons with the Blue Jays. At Rogers Centre, he hits .267 with an .809 OPS.

"It's a good hitters' ballpark," Overbay said. "There are really no negatives, except for the turf."

Overbay recalls how even minor injuries seemed to linger because of playing on the artificial surface.

"We won't have that problem because we're only there for three days," he said.


2-4 -- Pirates' interleague record against the Blue Jays

0-3 -- Pirates' record at Rogers Centre


"Our fans have been waiting a long time for this, just to see us be consistent and have a chance to win every day. They deserve it. They've gotten behind us." Lyle Overbay -- Pirates first baseman.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me