Pirates send d'Arnaud to DL, call on Leroux
ATLANTA — The Pirates placed infielder Chase d'Arnaud on the 15-day disabled list with a chip fracture to his right pinky finger Wednesday and recalled right-hander Chris Leroux from Triple-A Indianapolis to help replenish a depleted bullpen.
The only reliever not used in Tuesday's marathon game was Joel Hanrahan.
Not surprisingly, Daniel McCutchen was not available to pitch last night after his 5.2-inning, 92-pitch performance the night before. Also unavailable were Jason Grilli, who pitched three innings, and Chris Resop, who pitched one inning and appeared in a game for the third day in a row.
» Catcher Mike McKenry was given the night off after staying in the game for all 19 innings Tuesday. Hurdle said he hopes to find a day off for the other six players who played the entire game. The Pirates' next off day isn't until Aug. 11.
» In addition to being the longest game time-wise in the Pirates' 125-year history, it was also the longest in terms of innings since a 20-inning game against the Cubs on July 6, 1980, at Three Rivers Stadium. And the conclusion of the game, at 1:50 a.m., was the latest since a 2:04 a.m. finish in a doubleheader against the Cubs in Pittsburgh on June 20, 1983.
» Hurdle revealed that Paul Maholm and Kevin Correia offered to pitch if needed Tuesday night. They were going to go to Hanrahan if McCutchen could get through one more inning, then go from there.
"(Correia and Maholm) were both going to go see who could get loose quickest, have a little throw-off and be the next guy in," Hurdle said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.