Catcher Snyder hopes to stick with Pirates
PHOENIX — Catcher Chris Snyder said he "definitely" would like to return to the Pirates next year, but he wants the club to pick up his $6.75 million option.
"It's a team option, so the ball's in their court," Snyder said Tuesday. "Did I do anything production-wise to earn that option• I don't really think I did. But, it's there and it was negotiated."
Snyder, 30, got a three-year, $14.25 million contract extension in 2008, when he played for the Arizona Diamondbacks. He was traded to the Pirates on July 31, 2010.
"I know I struggled after the trade last year," Snyder said. "I don't think I've proven anything. But neither the fan base nor the organization has seen how I can play when I'm healthy."
Snyder, who's making $5.75 million this year, is recovering from back surgery and has not played since June 8. He played in 34 games and batted .271 with three homers and 17 RBI.
"I look back and it's one of those what-might've-been things," Snyder said. "This, by far, is one of the most frustrating seasons I've ever been in."
Snyder was given permission to leave the club last week and continue his rehab at his offseason home in Arizona. Before he left Pittsburgh, Snyder was able to hit off a tee and start a throwing program.
"Now, I can take it like a normal offseason," Snyder said. "I'll probably start throwing and hitting after Thanksgiving, like I normally would."
The Pirates are not expected to pick up Snyder's option.
Catcher Ryan Doumit's contract also is up this year and has two options worth a total of $15.5 million for 2012-13. The Pirates almost certainly will not trigger those options, but might open talks with Doumit for a new, lower-priced deal.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.