Locals filling out United States junior team
Penguins coach Dan Bylsma always enjoys watching the world junior hockey tournament, but he'll take special notice of this year's event.
Four local players — Gibsonia's Brandon Saad, East Palestine's J.T. Miller, Whitehall's John Gibson and Wampum's Stephen Johns — and Penguins prospect Josh Archibald will play for the United States. Archibald, currently with the University of Nebraska-Omaha, was the Penguins' sixth-round pick earlier this year.
"It's great," Bylsma said Thursday. "I spent some time with that team over the summer, so I'm keenly interested in all of those guys and the coaches and their success."
Johns, who's playing at Notre Dame, was selected in the second round of the 2010 draft. Saad (Ontario Hockey League's Saginaw Spirit), Miller (OHL's Plymouth Whalers) and Gibson (OHL's Kitchener Rangers) were chosen in the first two rounds this June. Before the draft, they spent time at Consol Energy Center with Bylsma.
"We'll be communicating with them via text once the tournament starts," Bylsma said.
Saad, who played two games for the Chicago Blackhawks this season before returning to Saginaw, was a surprising omission from last year's roster. The U.S. team fell to Canada in the semifinals, and the Canadians blew a late lead to lose to Russia in the gold-medal game.
This year's tournament, which begins Monday, is in Calgary and Edmonton. The gold medal will be awarded Jan. 5 in Calgary.
"It's an honor to represent your country at this high of a level," Saad said. "With all these elite players, it's exciting. I'm looking forward to getting started."
Scott Harrington, whom the Penguins selected in the second round in June, is on the roster for Canada. Fifth-round pick Dominik Uher will play for the Czech Republic.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.