NEWARK, N.J. — The Penguins, showing signs of good health for the first time in months, hope they won't be without right wing Tyler Kennedy when they visit Montreal on Tuesday.
Kennedy left Sunday's 5-2 loss in New Jersey with 2:21 remaining in the third period with an apparent foot or ankle injury. He was in considerable pain while leaving the ice, and he required the assistance of trainer Chris Stewart while hobbling to the locker room after leaving the ice.
The Penguins were unsure of the nature nor severity of the injury following the game.
"I don't know," coach Dan Bylsma said. "I know he's getting evaluated. We'll see."
Kennedy, who played most of the afternoon on a line with center Cal O'Reilly and left wing Steve Sullivan, registered four shots on New Jersey goalie Martin Brodeur but was held without a point.
> > It could easily be argued that the line of center Evgeni Malkin, right wing James Neal and left wing Chris Kunitz is the NHL's finest unit. Against New Jersey, however, the Penguins' top line had a day to forget. Although Malkin scored a power-play goal, the Penguins' top line was a combined minus-12. All three players on the top line were a minus-4. Star defenseman Kris Letang was a minus-3.
> > O'Reilly registered his first point with the Penguins in the second period. While standing in the right wing circle, O'Reilly made a nifty pass to defenseman Matt Niskanen, who scored his third goal of the season.
"I'm getting more comfortable," O'Reilly said. "I'm more comfortable with the system now. I think the more I play, the more confidence will start to show. I feel good."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.